feat: add conversation with grounded replies, sample mind and M1 acceptance test
Phase 8, completing milestone M1. A user message is stored and appended as an observation event carrying trust, actor, channel and reference. The perceive process analyses it deterministically (intent, introspection kind, entities, claims, urgency) and, within the per-cycle model allowance, enriches it through the perceive prompt. Its handler writes a perception event, an episodic memory with participants, turns claims into beliefs whose evidence is the message, and builds a response intent from state: beliefs and memories for the topic, evidence rows for why-questions, the uncertain band, contested beliefs and their links, recent learning, status changes, and honest declines for subsystems that do not exist yet or for requests with no capabilities. The respond prompt phrases the intent when a model is assigned; otherwise the reply is a direct rendering of the intent. response_generated cites the message, the perception, every belief and memory used, the episode and the model call. API: conversations, messages with optional wait, one-shot ask; chat UI with live refresh and a per-reply intent view. Sample mind Dani as a strictly decoded seed document with an import endpoint and noemactl mind import. tests/m1 drives all fourteen milestone steps including restart.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
||||
package conversation
|
||||
|
||||
import "testing"
|
||||
|
||||
func TestAnalyseIntents(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
cases := []struct {
|
||||
text, intent, intro string
|
||||
}{
|
||||
{"What are you thinking about?", "introspection", "thinking"},
|
||||
{"Why do you believe atlas is slow?", "introspection", "why"},
|
||||
{"What are you uncertain about?", "introspection", "uncertain"},
|
||||
{"Which of your beliefs contradict each other?", "introspection", "contradictions"},
|
||||
{"What did you learn this week?", "introspection", "learned"},
|
||||
{"What have you changed your mind about?", "introspection", "changed"},
|
||||
{"What do you currently believe about atlas?", "introspection", "beliefs"},
|
||||
{"Is atlas slow again since the deploy?", "question", ""},
|
||||
{"Please check the disk on server-01", "request", ""},
|
||||
{"No, that's wrong, atlas is on the new rack", "correction", ""},
|
||||
{"hello", "greeting", ""},
|
||||
{"Andy prefers Go for deployed services.", "statement", ""},
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, c := range cases {
|
||||
a := Analyse(c.text)
|
||||
if a.Intent != c.intent || a.Introspection != c.intro {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%q: got %s/%s want %s/%s", c.text, a.Intent, a.Introspection, c.intent, c.intro)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestAnalyseEntitiesClaimsAndUrgency(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
a := Analyse("server-01 is down and atlas.local shows SMART errors. I think the SATA cable might be loose.")
|
||||
if a.Urgency < 0.8 || a.Sentiment >= 0 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("urgency/sentiment wrong: %+v", a)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(a.Entities) < 2 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("entities missing: %v", a.Entities)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(a.Claims) != 2 || a.Claims[0].Certainty != "asserted" || a.Claims[1].Certainty != "hedged" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("claims wrong: %+v", a.Claims)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if b := Analyse("What do you believe about server-01?"); b.Topic != "server-01" {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("topic wrong: %q", b.Topic)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user