Andy Dixon
7821d89cf5
Beliefs gain a temporal scope (persistent, transient or unknown, classified deterministically from the proposition), an observation time and, for transient states, a validity interval. When a newer belief conflicts with an older transient one observed at least a minute earlier, the older belief is closed (valid_until set, status superseded, a supersedes link, a version and an event saying 'state changed') with its score untouched: 'the door was open at 10:00' stays true of 10:00 when it is closed at 10:05. Simultaneous conflicting reports and persistent propositions contradict as before. Introspection lists superseded states with their validity. Migration 0020 is additive.
526 lines
24 KiB
Go
526 lines
24 KiB
Go
package cognition
|
||
|
||
import (
|
||
"context"
|
||
"encoding/json"
|
||
"fmt"
|
||
"strings"
|
||
"time"
|
||
|
||
"github.com/andydixon/noema/internal/beliefs"
|
||
"github.com/andydixon/noema/internal/brain"
|
||
"github.com/andydixon/noema/internal/conversation"
|
||
"github.com/andydixon/noema/internal/epistemics"
|
||
evstore "github.com/andydixon/noema/internal/events"
|
||
"github.com/andydixon/noema/internal/llm"
|
||
"github.com/andydixon/noema/internal/memory"
|
||
"github.com/andydixon/noema/internal/workspace"
|
||
"github.com/andydixon/noema/pkg/concepts"
|
||
"github.com/andydixon/noema/pkg/events"
|
||
"github.com/andydixon/noema/pkg/ids"
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
// Intent is the structured decision of what to say, built from state before
|
||
// any language is generated. It is stored with the reply so the operator can
|
||
// check that the words match the intent and the intent matches the evidence.
|
||
type Intent struct {
|
||
Kind string `json:"kind"` // answer | introspect | acknowledge | clarify | decline | greet | unknown
|
||
Summary string `json:"summary"`
|
||
Points []string `json:"points"`
|
||
Beliefs []BeliefRef `json:"beliefs"`
|
||
Memories []MemRef `json:"memories"`
|
||
Uncertainty string `json:"uncertainty,omitempty"`
|
||
Limitations []string `json:"limitations,omitempty"`
|
||
Analysis any `json:"analysis"`
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// BeliefRef cites a belief.
|
||
type BeliefRef struct {
|
||
ID ids.ID `json:"id"`
|
||
Proposition string `json:"proposition"`
|
||
Confidence float64 `json:"confidence"`
|
||
Status string `json:"status"`
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// MemRef cites a memory.
|
||
type MemRef struct {
|
||
ID ids.ID `json:"id"`
|
||
Kind string `json:"kind"`
|
||
Content string `json:"content"`
|
||
Confidence float64 `json:"confidence"`
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// perceive is the handler for admitted "perceive" thoughts: it records the
|
||
// perception, encodes the episode, turns claims into beliefs, builds the
|
||
// response intent and generates the reply.
|
||
func (h Handlers) perceive(ctx context.Context, c *brain.Cycle, t workspace.Thought) error {
|
||
raw, _ := json.Marshal(t.Content["analysis"])
|
||
var a conversation.Analysis
|
||
json.Unmarshal(raw, &a) //nolint:errcheck
|
||
text, _ := t.Content["text"].(string)
|
||
actor, _ := t.Content["actor"].(string)
|
||
convID, _ := t.Content["conversation_id"].(string)
|
||
msgID, _ := t.Content["message_id"].(string)
|
||
srcID, _ := t.Content["source_event"].(string)
|
||
trust := events.Trust(fmt.Sprint(t.Content["trust"]))
|
||
if !trust.Valid() {
|
||
trust = events.TrustUser
|
||
}
|
||
mind := c.State.Mind
|
||
|
||
if call, ok := t.Content["llm_call"].(string); ok && call != "" {
|
||
c.Emit(events.New{Type: events.LLMResponse, Source: "brain.perceive", Summary: "perception enriched by " + fmt.Sprint(t.Content["llm_model"]), Salience: 0.1, Confidence: 0.8,
|
||
CausationID: t.EventID, Evidence: []events.EvidenceRef{{Kind: "llm_call", ID: call}}, Metadata: map[string]any{"role": "perceive", "call_id": call}})
|
||
}
|
||
perc, err := c.EmitNow(ctx, events.New{Type: events.Perception, Source: "brain.perceive", Summary: fmt.Sprintf("perceived %s from %s: %s", a.Intent, actor, truncate(text, 100)),
|
||
Salience: t.Score, Confidence: 0.9, CausationID: t.EventID, ParentIDs: []ids.ID{t.EventID, ids.ID(srcID)}, Evidence: t.Evidence,
|
||
Metadata: map[string]any{"intent": a.Intent, "introspection": a.Introspection, "conversation_id": convID, "message_id": msgID, "entities": a.Entities},
|
||
Payload: map[string]any{"analysis": a, "text": text, "actor": actor}})
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
return err
|
||
}
|
||
// Episode of the exchange.
|
||
var memRef ids.ID
|
||
if h.Memory != nil {
|
||
mem, err := h.Memory.Create(ctx, c.Tx, memory.New{MindID: mind.ID, Kind: concepts.Episodic, Epistemic: concepts.Observation, Content: actor + " said: " + text, Source: "conversation",
|
||
Trust: trust, Confidence: 1, Importance: 0.4 + 0.3*a.Urgency, Salience: t.Score, OccurredAt: c.State.Now, OriginEvent: ids.ID(srcID),
|
||
Detail: map[string]any{"participants": []string{actor}, "channel": "conversation", "conversation_id": convID, "intent": a.Intent, "entities": a.Entities}})
|
||
if err == nil {
|
||
memRef = mem.ID
|
||
c.Emit(events.New{Type: events.MemoryCreated, Source: "brain.memory", Summary: "remembered: " + truncate(mem.Content, 100), Salience: 0.3, Confidence: 1, CausationID: perc.ID,
|
||
Evidence: []events.EvidenceRef{{Kind: "memory", ID: string(mem.ID)}, {Kind: "event", ID: srcID, Note: "source"}}, Metadata: map[string]any{"memory_id": mem.ID, "kind": mem.Kind}})
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
// Every claim is first an assertion: the certain fact that someone took a
|
||
// stance. Only factual assertions (direct or reported) then feed a
|
||
// proposition belief, as one piece of evidence attributed to whoever
|
||
// actually stands behind it; hypotheticals, questions and imperatives
|
||
// never do, and expressed doubt counts against.
|
||
var claimed []BeliefRef
|
||
var asserted []AssertionRef
|
||
if h.Beliefs != nil {
|
||
for _, cl := range a.Claims {
|
||
in := epistemics.Interpret(actor, cl.Proposition)
|
||
if cl.Certainty == "hedged" && in.Certainty == epistemics.CertaintyAsserted {
|
||
in.Certainty = epistemics.CertaintyHedged
|
||
}
|
||
var beliefID ids.ID
|
||
var res beliefs.Result
|
||
if in.CreatesBelief() {
|
||
w := in.EvidenceWeight()
|
||
if a.Intent == "correction" && !in.Reported {
|
||
w = min(1, w+0.2)
|
||
}
|
||
attributed := in.AttributedTo
|
||
cred := trust.Credibility()
|
||
if in.Reported {
|
||
cred = events.TrustLow.Credibility() + 0.2 // second-hand through a trusted speaker
|
||
}
|
||
ev := []beliefs.EvidenceInput{{Direction: "for", Kind: "assertion", RefID: "", Source: "asserted-by:" + attributed, Weight: w, Credibility: cred,
|
||
Note: describeAssertion(actor, in), Derivation: beliefs.DerivationAssertion, Family: beliefs.FamilyForActor(attributed), RootIDs: []string{srcID}}}
|
||
if dw := in.DoubtWeight(); dw > 0 {
|
||
ev = append(ev, beliefs.EvidenceInput{Direction: "against", Kind: "assertion", Source: "doubted-by:" + actor, Weight: dw, Credibility: trust.Credibility(),
|
||
Note: actor + " doubts it", Derivation: beliefs.DerivationAssertion, Family: beliefs.FamilyForActor(actor), RootIDs: []string{srcID}})
|
||
}
|
||
var err error
|
||
observed := c.State.Now
|
||
res, err = h.Beliefs.Create(ctx, c.Tx, emitter(c), beliefs.New{MindID: mind.ID, Proposition: in.Proposition, Epistemic: concepts.Claim, Source: "conversation", OriginEvent: perc.ID, Causation: perc.ID, Correlation: c.State.CycleID, Evidence: ev, ObservedAt: &observed,
|
||
Detail: map[string]any{"attributed_to": attributed, "reported": in.Reported, "interpretation_confidence": in.Confidence}})
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
c.Emit(events.New{Type: events.Metacognition, Source: "brain.perceive", Summary: "claim not recorded: " + err.Error(), Salience: 0.3, Confidence: 1, Metadata: map[string]any{"check": "claim_rejected"}})
|
||
} else {
|
||
beliefID = res.Belief.ID
|
||
claimed = append(claimed, BeliefRef{ID: res.Belief.ID, Proposition: res.Belief.Proposition, Confidence: res.Belief.Confidence, Status: string(res.Belief.Status)})
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
if h.Assertions != nil {
|
||
rec, err := h.Assertions.Record(ctx, c.Tx, epistemics.New{MindID: mind.ID, Actor: actor, ActorKind: string(trust), Interpretation: in, Subject: subjectKey(in.Proposition), SourceEvent: ids.ID(srcID), ConversationID: ids.ID(convID), MessageID: ids.ID(msgID), Context: truncate(text, 300), Trust: string(trust), BeliefID: beliefID})
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
return err
|
||
}
|
||
asserted = append(asserted, AssertionRef{ID: rec.ID, AttributedTo: rec.AttributedTo, Proposition: rec.Proposition, Stance: rec.Stance, Modality: rec.Modality, Reported: rec.Reported, Hypothetical: rec.Hypothetical, Interpretation: rec.Interpretation, BeliefID: beliefID})
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
_ = asserted
|
||
refs := map[string]ids.ID{"memory": memRef}
|
||
for _, b := range claimed {
|
||
refs["belief"] = b.ID
|
||
}
|
||
h.linkEntities(ctx, c, a.Entities, actor, ids.ID(srcID), refs)
|
||
intent := h.buildIntent(ctx, c, a, text, claimed)
|
||
reply, callID, err := h.generate(ctx, c, text, intent)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
return err
|
||
}
|
||
evidence := []events.EvidenceRef{{Kind: "event", ID: srcID, Note: "question"}, {Kind: "event", ID: string(perc.ID), Note: "perception"}}
|
||
for _, b := range intent.Beliefs {
|
||
evidence = append(evidence, events.EvidenceRef{Kind: "belief", ID: string(b.ID), Note: fmt.Sprintf("cited %.2f", b.Confidence)})
|
||
}
|
||
for _, m := range intent.Memories {
|
||
evidence = append(evidence, events.EvidenceRef{Kind: "memory", ID: string(m.ID), Note: "cited"})
|
||
}
|
||
if !memRef.IsZero() {
|
||
evidence = append(evidence, events.EvidenceRef{Kind: "memory", ID: string(memRef), Note: "episode"})
|
||
}
|
||
if !callID.IsZero() {
|
||
evidence = append(evidence, events.EvidenceRef{Kind: "llm_call", ID: string(callID), Note: "wording"})
|
||
}
|
||
respEv, err := c.EmitNow(ctx, events.New{Type: events.ResponseGenerated, Source: "brain.respond", Summary: "replied (" + intent.Kind + "): " + truncate(reply, 120), Salience: 0.5, Confidence: intentConfidence(intent),
|
||
CausationID: perc.ID, ParentIDs: []ids.ID{perc.ID}, Evidence: evidence,
|
||
Metadata: map[string]any{"conversation_id": convID, "message_id": msgID, "intent": intent.Kind, "llm_call": callID},
|
||
Payload: map[string]any{"intent": intent, "reply": reply, "model_used": !callID.IsZero()}})
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
return err
|
||
}
|
||
if h.Conversations != nil && convID != "" {
|
||
intentJSON, _ := json.Marshal(intent)
|
||
if _, err := h.Conversations.AddMessage(ctx, c.Tx, conversation.Message{ConversationID: ids.ID(convID), MindID: mind.ID, Role: "mind", Actor: mind.DisplayName, Content: reply,
|
||
EventID: respEv.ID, ReplyTo: ids.ID(msgID), Intent: intentJSON, LLMCallID: callID}); err != nil {
|
||
return fmt.Errorf("store reply: %w", err)
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
c.Runtime.Hold(workspace.Item{Key: "conversation:" + convID, Content: actor + ": " + truncate(text, 80) + " → " + truncate(reply, 80), Kind: "thought", SourceEvent: ids.ID(srcID), Ref: convID})
|
||
return nil
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func intentConfidence(in Intent) float64 {
|
||
var max float64
|
||
for _, b := range in.Beliefs {
|
||
if b.Confidence > max {
|
||
max = b.Confidence
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
switch in.Kind {
|
||
case "unknown", "decline":
|
||
return 0.9 // confident that it does not know
|
||
case "introspect", "acknowledge", "greet":
|
||
return 0.95
|
||
}
|
||
if max == 0 {
|
||
return 0.5
|
||
}
|
||
return max
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// buildIntent decides what to convey from state alone.
|
||
func (h Handlers) buildIntent(ctx context.Context, c *brain.Cycle, a conversation.Analysis, text string, claimed []BeliefRef) Intent {
|
||
mind := c.State.Mind
|
||
in := Intent{Analysis: a, Limitations: c.State.SelfModel.Limitations}
|
||
if len(in.Limitations) > 3 {
|
||
in.Limitations = in.Limitations[:3]
|
||
}
|
||
topic := a.Topic
|
||
if topic == "" {
|
||
topic = text
|
||
}
|
||
switch a.Intent {
|
||
case "greeting":
|
||
in.Kind, in.Summary = "greet", "Greet "+firstNonEmpty(a.Topic, "the user")+" briefly and offer to help."
|
||
case "statement", "correction":
|
||
in.Kind = "acknowledge"
|
||
if len(claimed) == 0 {
|
||
in.Summary = "Acknowledge the message; no checkable claim was found in it."
|
||
break
|
||
}
|
||
in.Beliefs = claimed
|
||
in.Summary = fmt.Sprintf("Acknowledge that %d statement(s) were recorded as claims with the shown confidence, noting they rest on this message alone.", len(claimed))
|
||
for _, b := range claimed {
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, fmt.Sprintf("Recorded \"%s\" as a %s at confidence %.2f.", b.Proposition, b.Status, b.Confidence))
|
||
if b.Status == string(beliefs.StatusContested) {
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, "That conflicts with something I already held; both are now contested.")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
case "request":
|
||
in.Kind = "decline"
|
||
var usable []string
|
||
for _, cap := range c.State.SelfModel.Capabilities {
|
||
if cap.Policy == "allow" || cap.Policy == "ask" {
|
||
usable = append(usable, cap.Name+" ("+cap.Policy+")")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
if len(usable) == 0 {
|
||
in.Summary = "Explain honestly that no external capabilities are granted, so the request cannot be carried out; offer what is known instead."
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, "I have no capabilities granted to act on external systems.")
|
||
} else {
|
||
in.Kind = "acknowledge"
|
||
in.Summary = "Say which capabilities could apply and that any action goes through policy; if one was proposed this cycle its status is in working memory."
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, "Capabilities I may use: "+strings.Join(usable, ", ")+".")
|
||
for _, it := range c.Runtime.Workspace().WorkingMemory {
|
||
if strings.HasPrefix(it.Key, "action:") {
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, "Action status: "+it.Content)
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
h.addKnowledge(ctx, c, &in, topic)
|
||
case "introspection":
|
||
in.Kind = "introspect"
|
||
h.introspect(ctx, c, &in, a, topic)
|
||
default: // question, other
|
||
in.Kind = "answer"
|
||
h.addKnowledge(ctx, c, &in, topic)
|
||
if len(in.Beliefs) == 0 && len(in.Memories) == 0 {
|
||
in.Kind = "unknown"
|
||
in.Summary = "Say plainly that nothing is known about this; do not guess."
|
||
in.Uncertainty = "No beliefs or memories match the question."
|
||
} else {
|
||
in.Summary = "Answer from the cited beliefs and memories, stating confidence; say what is uncertain."
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
if in.Points == nil {
|
||
in.Points = []string{}
|
||
}
|
||
if in.Beliefs == nil {
|
||
in.Beliefs = []BeliefRef{}
|
||
}
|
||
if in.Memories == nil {
|
||
in.Memories = []MemRef{}
|
||
}
|
||
_ = mind
|
||
return in
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// addKnowledge cites the beliefs and memories relevant to a topic.
|
||
func (h Handlers) addKnowledge(ctx context.Context, c *brain.Cycle, in *Intent, topic string) {
|
||
mind := c.State.Mind.ID
|
||
if h.Beliefs != nil {
|
||
if bs, _ := h.Beliefs.Search(ctx, mind, topic, 5); len(bs) > 0 {
|
||
var maxConf float64
|
||
for _, b := range bs {
|
||
if b.Status == beliefs.StatusRejected {
|
||
continue
|
||
}
|
||
if b.Status == beliefs.StatusUnknown {
|
||
// Recorded but unsupported either way: say so rather than quote the prior.
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, "I do not know whether "+b.Proposition+": it was recorded, but nothing live supports or opposes it.")
|
||
continue
|
||
}
|
||
in.Beliefs = append(in.Beliefs, BeliefRef{ID: b.ID, Proposition: b.Proposition, Confidence: b.Confidence, Status: string(b.Status)})
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, fmt.Sprintf("%s (%s, %.2f)", b.Proposition, b.Status, b.Confidence))
|
||
if b.Confidence > maxConf {
|
||
maxConf = b.Confidence
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
if maxConf > 0 && maxConf < 0.6 {
|
||
in.Uncertainty = fmt.Sprintf("The strongest relevant belief is only at %.2f.", maxConf)
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
// Historical truth is not overwritten by the present: say what was
|
||
// true and when, alongside what is believed now.
|
||
if past, _ := h.Beliefs.History(ctx, mind, topic, 3); len(past) > 0 {
|
||
for _, b := range past {
|
||
from := "earlier"
|
||
if b.ValidFrom != nil {
|
||
from = b.ValidFrom.Format("15:04 on 2 Jan")
|
||
}
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, fmt.Sprintf("Earlier: %s (true from %s until %s, then superseded).", b.Proposition, from, b.ValidUntil.Format("15:04 on 2 Jan")))
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
if h.Memory != nil {
|
||
if hits, _ := h.Memory.Retrieve(ctx, mind, memory.Query{Text: topic, Limit: 4, Now: c.State.Now, Semantic: true}); len(hits) > 0 {
|
||
for _, r := range hits {
|
||
if r.Score < 0.3 {
|
||
continue
|
||
}
|
||
in.Memories = append(in.Memories, MemRef{ID: r.Memory.ID, Kind: string(r.Memory.Kind), Content: truncate(r.Memory.Content, 200), Confidence: r.Memory.Confidence})
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, fmt.Sprintf("I remember: %s (%s, %.2f)", truncate(r.Memory.Content, 160), r.Memory.Kind, r.Memory.Confidence))
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// introspect answers questions about the mind's own state from that state.
|
||
func (h Handlers) introspect(ctx context.Context, c *brain.Cycle, in *Intent, a conversation.Analysis, topic string) {
|
||
mind := c.State.Mind.ID
|
||
ws := c.Runtime.Workspace()
|
||
switch a.Introspection {
|
||
case "thinking":
|
||
in.Summary = "Describe what is currently in the workspace and working memory, most salient first."
|
||
for i, t := range ws.Workspace {
|
||
if i >= 5 {
|
||
break
|
||
}
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, fmt.Sprintf("%s (score %.2f)", t.Summary, t.Score))
|
||
}
|
||
for i, it := range ws.WorkingMemory {
|
||
if i >= 4 {
|
||
break
|
||
}
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, "holding: "+truncate(it.Content, 100))
|
||
}
|
||
if len(in.Points) == 0 {
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, "The workspace is empty; nothing is being attended to right now.")
|
||
}
|
||
case "beliefs":
|
||
in.Summary = "List what is believed about the topic with confidence and status; say if nothing is known."
|
||
h.addKnowledge(ctx, c, in, topic)
|
||
if len(in.Beliefs) == 0 && len(in.Memories) == 0 {
|
||
in.Kind, in.Uncertainty = "unknown", "No beliefs or memories concern "+topic+"."
|
||
}
|
||
case "why":
|
||
in.Summary = "Explain the evidence for and against the belief the user asked about, and what would change it."
|
||
if h.Beliefs != nil {
|
||
if bs, _ := h.Beliefs.Search(ctx, mind, topic, 1); len(bs) > 0 {
|
||
b := bs[0]
|
||
in.Beliefs = append(in.Beliefs, BeliefRef{ID: b.ID, Proposition: b.Proposition, Confidence: b.Confidence, Status: string(b.Status)})
|
||
rows, _ := h.Beliefs.EvidenceFor(ctx, c.Tx, mind, b.ID)
|
||
for _, e := range rows {
|
||
if e.Retracted {
|
||
continue
|
||
}
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, fmt.Sprintf("%s: %s (weight %.2f × credibility %.2f)", e.Direction, firstNonEmpty(e.Note, e.Kind), e.Weight, e.Credibility))
|
||
}
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, "Independent evidence from another source would move it most; a contradicting observation would lower it.")
|
||
} else {
|
||
in.Kind, in.Summary = "unknown", "Say that no belief matches what was asked."
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
case "uncertain":
|
||
in.Summary = "List the beliefs that are least settled, with confidence."
|
||
if h.Beliefs != nil {
|
||
bs, _ := h.Beliefs.Uncertain(ctx, mind, 6)
|
||
for _, b := range bs {
|
||
in.Beliefs = append(in.Beliefs, BeliefRef{ID: b.ID, Proposition: b.Proposition, Confidence: b.Confidence, Status: string(b.Status)})
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, fmt.Sprintf("%s (%s, %.2f)", b.Proposition, b.Status, b.Confidence))
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
if len(in.Points) == 0 {
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, "No beliefs sit in the uncertain band right now.")
|
||
}
|
||
case "contradictions":
|
||
in.Summary = "List contested beliefs and what they conflict with."
|
||
if h.Beliefs != nil {
|
||
bs, _ := h.Beliefs.Contested(ctx, mind, 6)
|
||
for _, b := range bs {
|
||
in.Beliefs = append(in.Beliefs, BeliefRef{ID: b.ID, Proposition: b.Proposition, Confidence: b.Confidence, Status: string(b.Status)})
|
||
links, _ := h.Beliefs.Links(ctx, mind, b.ID)
|
||
for _, l := range links {
|
||
if l.Relation == "contradicts" && l.Other != nil {
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, fmt.Sprintf("\"%s\" (%.2f) contradicts \"%s\" (%.2f)", b.Proposition, b.Confidence, l.Other.Proposition, l.Other.Confidence))
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
if len(in.Points) == 0 {
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, "No contradictions are currently open.")
|
||
}
|
||
case "learned":
|
||
in.Summary = "Summarise what was recorded in the last seven days: new memories and beliefs."
|
||
evs, _ := c.Runtime.Events().Query(ctx, evstore.Filter{MindID: mind, Types: []events.Type{events.MemoryCreated, events.BeliefCreated, events.HypothesisCreated, events.MemoryConsolidated}, Since: c.State.Now.Add(-7 * 24 * time.Hour), Limit: 8})
|
||
for _, e := range evs {
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, e.Summary)
|
||
}
|
||
if len(in.Points) == 0 {
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, "Nothing new was recorded this week.")
|
||
}
|
||
case "changed":
|
||
in.Summary = "List beliefs whose status changed recently and why."
|
||
if h.Beliefs != nil {
|
||
ch, _ := h.Beliefs.RecentChanges(ctx, mind, c.State.Now.Add(-30*24*time.Hour), 6)
|
||
for _, x := range ch {
|
||
in.Beliefs = append(in.Beliefs, BeliefRef{ID: x.Belief.ID, Proposition: x.Belief.Proposition, Confidence: x.Belief.Confidence, Status: string(x.Belief.Status)})
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, fmt.Sprintf("\"%s\": %s (%.2f) → %s (%.2f) because %s", x.Belief.Proposition, x.FromStatus, x.FromConf, x.Belief.Status, x.Belief.Confidence, firstNonEmpty(x.Reason, "evidence changed")))
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
if len(in.Points) == 0 {
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, "No belief has changed status in the last month.")
|
||
}
|
||
default: // predictions, curious, surprised, patterns: subsystems not yet present
|
||
in.Kind = "decline"
|
||
in.Summary = "Explain that this aspect of self-observation is not available in this version, without inventing anything."
|
||
in.Points = append(in.Points, "I do not yet keep "+a.Introspection+" records, so I cannot report on them honestly.")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// generate phrases the intent. With a model: the respond prompt, constrained
|
||
// to cited material. Without: a deterministic rendering of the points.
|
||
func (h Handlers) generate(ctx context.Context, c *brain.Cycle, text string, in Intent) (string, ids.ID, error) {
|
||
s := c.State
|
||
if s.Services.LLM != nil && s.Services.Prompts != nil && s.Services.LLM.Available(ctx, llm.RoleRespond) && s.AllowLLM() {
|
||
if pr, err := s.Services.Prompts.Get(ctx, "respond"); err == nil {
|
||
data := map[string]any{"Brief": s.Mind.Personality.Brief(), "Intent": in.Summary + "\n" + strings.Join(in.Points, "\n"), "Beliefs": in.Beliefs, "Memories": in.Memories, "Uncertainty": in.Uncertainty, "Limitations": in.Limitations, "Message": text}
|
||
if req, err := pr.Render(data); err == nil {
|
||
req.MindID, req.CorrelationID, req.Purpose = s.Mind.ID, s.CycleID, "respond"
|
||
c.Emit(events.New{Type: events.LLMRequest, Source: "brain.respond", Summary: "asked model to phrase reply (" + in.Kind + ")", Salience: 0.1, Confidence: 1, Metadata: map[string]any{"role": "respond", "prompt": pr.Name, "version": pr.CurrentVersion}})
|
||
resp, err := s.Services.LLM.Complete(ctx, req)
|
||
if err == nil && strings.TrimSpace(resp.Text) != "" {
|
||
c.Emit(events.New{Type: events.LLMResponse, Source: "brain.respond", Summary: "model phrased reply via " + resp.Provider + "/" + resp.Model, Salience: 0.1, Confidence: 1,
|
||
Evidence: []events.EvidenceRef{{Kind: "llm_call", ID: string(resp.CallID)}}, Metadata: map[string]any{"role": "respond", "call_id": string(resp.CallID), "tokens": resp.Usage.TotalTokens}})
|
||
return strings.TrimSpace(resp.Text), resp.CallID, nil
|
||
}
|
||
c.Emit(events.New{Type: events.Metacognition, Source: "brain.respond", Summary: "model reply failed; using deterministic wording", Salience: 0.3, Confidence: 1, Metadata: map[string]any{"check": "llm_failure", "error": errString(err)}})
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
return deterministicReply(in), ids.Nil, nil
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func errString(err error) string {
|
||
if err == nil {
|
||
return "empty response"
|
||
}
|
||
return err.Error()
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// deterministicReply renders the intent without a model: honest, plain, with
|
||
// confidences visible.
|
||
func deterministicReply(in Intent) string {
|
||
var b strings.Builder
|
||
switch in.Kind {
|
||
case "greet":
|
||
b.WriteString("Hello. I can tell you what I currently hold and how sure I am of it.")
|
||
case "unknown":
|
||
b.WriteString("I don't know. Nothing I hold bears on that.")
|
||
case "decline":
|
||
b.WriteString("I can't do that.")
|
||
case "acknowledge":
|
||
b.WriteString("Noted.")
|
||
case "introspect":
|
||
b.WriteString("From my current state:")
|
||
default:
|
||
b.WriteString("Here is what I hold on that:")
|
||
}
|
||
for _, p := range in.Points {
|
||
b.WriteString("\n- " + p)
|
||
}
|
||
if in.Uncertainty != "" {
|
||
b.WriteString("\n" + in.Uncertainty)
|
||
}
|
||
b.WriteString("\n(No language model is configured, so this is a direct rendering of my state.)")
|
||
return b.String()
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func firstNonEmpty(a, b string) string {
|
||
if a != "" {
|
||
return a
|
||
}
|
||
return b
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// AssertionRef is the response intent's view of a recorded assertion.
|
||
type AssertionRef struct {
|
||
ID ids.ID `json:"id"`
|
||
AttributedTo string `json:"attributed_to"`
|
||
Proposition string `json:"proposition"`
|
||
Stance string `json:"stance"`
|
||
Modality string `json:"modality"`
|
||
Reported bool `json:"reported"`
|
||
Hypothetical bool `json:"hypothetical"`
|
||
Interpretation float64 `json:"interpretation_confidence"`
|
||
BeliefID ids.ID `json:"belief_id,omitempty"`
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// describeAssertion words the evidence note so the belief page says who
|
||
// stood behind the proposition and how the mind read them.
|
||
func describeAssertion(speaker string, in epistemics.Interpretation) string {
|
||
switch {
|
||
case in.Reported && in.Quoted:
|
||
return speaker + " quoted " + in.AttributedTo + " (" + in.Certainty + ")"
|
||
case in.Reported:
|
||
return speaker + " reported that " + in.AttributedTo + " holds this (" + in.Certainty + ", read with " + fmt.Sprintf("%.0f%%", in.Confidence*100) + " interpretation confidence)"
|
||
default:
|
||
return speaker + " " + in.Certainty + " it (read with " + fmt.Sprintf("%.0f%%", in.Confidence*100) + " interpretation confidence)"
|
||
}
|
||
}
|