{{if $r.SourceTitle}}{{$r.SourceTitle}}{{else}}(item){{end}} {{relTypeLabel $r.Rel.Type}} {{if $r.TargetTitle}}{{$r.TargetTitle}}{{else}}(item){{end}}
Proposed by analysis. This is a suggestion, not an established fact, until someone confirms it.
{{end}} {{if $r.Rel.Evidence.SourceExcerpt}}From the first item{{$r.Rel.Evidence.SourceExcerpt}}{{if $r.Rel.Evidence.TargetExcerpt}}
From the second item{{$r.Rel.Evidence.TargetExcerpt}}{{end}}
Evidence — how this strength was calculated
| Signal | Evidence | Strength | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{.Type}} | {{.Value}}{{if .Detail}} {{.Detail}}{{end}} |
{{score2 .Strength}} | {{score2 .Weight}} | {{score2 .Contribution}} |
| Total (capped at 1.00) | {{score2 $r.Rel.Score}} | |||
Shared entities: {{range $r.Rel.Evidence.SharedEntities}}{{.}}{{end}}
{{end}} {{if $r.Rel.Evidence.ModelRationale}}Model opinion
A language model{{if $r.Rel.Evidence.ModelVersion}} ({{$r.Rel.Evidence.ModelVersion}}){{end}} described the connection as follows. This is one signal among those above, not the score itself, and it is not a verified fact.
{{$r.Rel.Evidence.ModelRationale}}
Decision history
-
{{range $r.Rel.ReviewHistory}}
-
{{.Action}} by {{if .ActorName}}{{.ActorName}}{{else}}unknown{{end}}
on {{datetime .At}}
{{if .FromValue}}({{.FromValue}} → {{.ToValue}}){{end}}
{{if .Note}}
“{{.Note}}”{{end}}
{{end}}
History is append-only. Rejecting a relationship never deletes the original proposal or its evidence.
{{end}}